Summary report on the critical incident interview

Summary report on the critical incident interview

ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Summary report on the critical incident interview

Summary report on the critical incident interview

 

Details:

As the second part of the CIT Interview Techniques assignment, write a summary report (1,250-1,500 words) about the information gleaned from the interview process in Module 7.

Interview Preliminaries Redux:

1. Select two to three people to whom you will administer the interview developed in Module 7.
2. Administer interview questions to chosen participants for final formal interview purposes.
3. Revise your original questions. Administer the additional final set of questions regarding why the selected incidents might be important (i.e., have the participants identify the meaning of the incidents discussed during the interview process).
4. Provide follow-up questions as necessary along with subsequent responses.

Interview Summary Report

1. Write a summary report (1,250-1,500 words) about the information gleaned from the interview process.
2. Conclude paper with a discussion of the participants’ descriptions of the meaning of the incidents described during the interview process.

Use the GCU eLibrary databases; include a minimum of three outside references or other resources for evidentiary support.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

 

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.